User agent detail

Palm680/RC1 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/Palm-D053; Blazer/4.5) 16;320x320 UP.Link/6.3.1.17.06.3.1.17.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/pda/palm.yaml
Blazer 4.5Palm OS PalmTreo 680mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Palm Source Win98 98Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Blazer 4.5closePalm OS PalmTreo 680mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Palm Blazer 4.5 palmOS Palm680smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Palm Blazer 4.5closeWindows 98 Palm680closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Blazer 4.5closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Blazer 4.5 Palm OS PalmTreo 680mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close PalmTreo 680Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:54 | by ThaDafinser