User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; xx; GT-I8000 Build/FRG83G) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-samsung-android.yaml
Android Browser Android 2.2.2Webkit 533.1SamsungOmnia 2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2SamsungOmnia IIsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.2closeAndroid 2.2.2SamsungGT-I8000closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.2SamsungOmnia 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:54 | by ThaDafinser