User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; Xbox)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
IE 9.0Win7 6.15.0 5.0MicrosoftXbox 360TV Device Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 9.0Trident 5.0Win7 6.1MicrosoftXbox 360TV Device0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 9.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.28503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident Windows 7MicrosoftXbox 360console0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 9.0closeWindows 7 MicrosoftXboxcloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 5.0Windows Windows NT 6.1MicrosoftXBox 360closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 5.0 MicrosoftXbox 360gaming:consolecloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Xbox 360 9.0closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 13.10586closeWindows 10MicrosoftXbox 360Smart-TVcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:53 | by ThaDafinser