User agent detail

AndroidNative/2.0.51 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; de-de; LENOVO IdeaTab A3000-H; Build/JDQ39) tablet; 1024x552; Lenovo
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoIdeaTab A3000-H Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AndroidNative 2.0.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoIdeaTab A3000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2LenovoIdeaTabsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoIdeaTab A3000-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.2.2LenovoIdeaTab A3000tabletyescloseclose0.10701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.10501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:53 | by ThaDafinser