User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.2.2; en-US; QMobile A30) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.1.344 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 9.3.1.344Android 4.2.2 QMobileA30smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux IntexAqua Y2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 Android 4.2QMobileA30smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.1closeAndroid 4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.1.344 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Gecko Android 4.2.2Q-MobileNoir A30mobile:smartyescloseclose0.04 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:52 | by ThaDafinser