User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; zh-CN; HUAWEI MT1-T00 Build/HuaweiMT1-T00) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.360 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiMT1-T00 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U3 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.19202 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.42604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5WebKit Android 4.1HuaweiAscend Mate 1phabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0closeAndroid 4.1.2HuaweiMT1-T00closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.28803 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.360WebKit 533.1Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.38904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Webkit 533.1Android 4.1.2HuaweiAscend Matemobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:52 | by ThaDafinser