User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6.8; U; Edition Labs HTML5 Parser; xx) Presto/2.9.181 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Labs 12.00Mac OS X 10.6Presto 2.9.181desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.00closeOS X 10.6.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.00Presto Mac 10.6desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00closeOS X 10.6.8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.0closeMac OS X 10.6.8closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeOS X 10.6.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.9.181Mac OS X 10.6.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Labs 12.00Presto 2.9.181Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:52 | by ThaDafinser