User agent detail

NokiaC1-01/2.0 (03.35) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 nokiac1-01/UC Browser7.6.1.82/69/351 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 7.6JAVA unknownunknown NokiaC1Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.6WebKit JAVA NokiaC1Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NokiaC1-01 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 7.6.1.82closeSeries40 NokiaC1-01mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.6 Symbian NokiaC1-01smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.6.1close NokiaC1-01closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.6.1.82 NokiaOS NokiaNokia C1-01closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.6Gecko Series40 NokiaC1-01mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close NokiaC1-01Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:52 | by ThaDafinser