User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; de-de) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Apple Mail 4.2iOS 4.2unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Apple Mail 4.2WebKit iOS 4.2AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.17.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 4.2.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 4.2AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 4.2.1closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView closeiOS 4.2.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 533.17.9iOS 4.2.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533.17.9iOS 4.2.1AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.2.1closeiOS 4.2.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:52 | by ThaDafinser