User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (;;;;) Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ANTGalio/3.0.2.1.22.43.08; Linux2.6.18-7.1/7405d0-smp)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
ANTGalio 3.0.2.1.22.43.08GNU/Linux tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HbbTV 1.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
ANT Galio 3.0.2.1.22.43.08close media-playercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ANTGalio 3.0 GNU/Linux PhilipsNetTV Seriestv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux HbbTVcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ANT Galio 3.0.2 televisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:51 | by ThaDafinser