User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; LIFETAB_E7316 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.94 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MedionLifetab E7316 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.15602 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.26903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.2MedionLifetab E7316tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.2.2MedionLifetab E7316closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.16002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.94Blink Android 4.2.2MedionLifetab E7316tabletyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2MedionLifetab E7316Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:51 | by ThaDafinser