User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-us; GIONEE_Ctrl_V1 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) FlyFlow/1.3 Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GioneeCtrl_V1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
FlyFlow WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4GioneeCtrl V1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0GioneeCtrl V1smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Baidu Explorer 1.3closeAndroid 4.0.4GioneeCtrl_V1closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.11101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 1.3Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.4GioneeCTRL V1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0GioneeCtrl V1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:51 | by ThaDafinser