User agent detail

Lenovo-A278t_TD/S100 Linux/2.6.35 Android/2.3.5 Release/09.03.2012 Browser/AppleWebkit533.1 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-android.yaml
Android Browser Android 2.3.5Webkit 533.1LenovoA278mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5LenovoA278mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA278tsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid 2.3.5LenovoA278t_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5LenovoA278mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3LenovoA278tSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:51 | by ThaDafinser