User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; xx; MT620 Build/THTTD_N_01.01.27I) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-motorola.yaml
Android Browser Android 2.2.2Webkit 533.1MotorolaMOTO MT620mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.16702 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.2closeAndroid 2.2.2SonyEricssonMT620closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.2MotorolaMOTO MT620mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:51 | by ThaDafinser