User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Android; Opera Mini/7.6.40077/36.1633; U; sr) Presto/2.12.423 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mini 7.6Android unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 7.6Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 7.6.40077closeAndroid OperaMini 5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.6Presto Android yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.6.40077closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.6.40077closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.6.40077closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.16202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 7.6.40077Presto 2.12.423Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 7.6Presto 2.12.423Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:50 | by ThaDafinser