User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod touch; CPU iPhone OS 8_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/600.1.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/12B411
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-511.php
Mobile Safari UIWebView 0.0iOS 8.1unknown AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 8.1AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 600.1.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 8.1AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 8.1AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 8.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView closeiOS 8.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 600.1.4iOS 8.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose1.58716 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 600.1.4iOS 8.1AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:50 | by ThaDafinser