User agent detail

Samsung-SCHR330 Infraware-Polaris/6.0 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCHR330 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Samsung-SCHR330 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Polaris 6.0closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungSCHR330smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.0close SamsungSCHR330closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Polaris 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Polaris 6.0 SamsungSCHR330 Infraware-Polarismobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:49 | by ThaDafinser