User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; XT0000 Build/KLC20.53-L1.3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.136 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaXT0000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.18002 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.31703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.4MotorolaXT0000smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.4.2MotorolaXT0000closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.18402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.4.2XT0000mobile:smartyescloseclose0.07701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:49 | by ThaDafinser