User agent detail

HTC ONE S_4.1.8_weibo_3.0.1_android
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCONE S_4.1.8_weibo_3.0.1_ Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCONE S 4.1.8 weibo 3.0.1 androidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCONE S 4smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCONE S_4.1.8_weibo_3.0.1_closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTC Onecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCONE S 4.1.8 weibo 3.0.1 androidmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:49 | by ThaDafinser