User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux x86_64; Debian) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Opera 12.12Debian Presto 2.12.388desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.12Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.12closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.12Presto Debian desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.12closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.12closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.12closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.12Presto 2.12.388Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.12Presto 2.12.388Debian desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.12closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:48 | by ThaDafinser