User agent detail

Nokia208/2.0 (03.39) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; Nokia208) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.449 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/header-wap.yaml
UC Browser 9.5Series40 Gecko Nokia208mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia208 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close Nokia208mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 Symbian Nokia208smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0close Nokia208closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.449 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 208closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Series40 Nokia208mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close Nokia208Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:48 | by ThaDafinser