User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Zetakey/3.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Zetakey Browser 3.2Android unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Zetakey Browser 3.2WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 533.1Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Zetakey 3.2Webkit 533.1Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.05401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:47 | by ThaDafinser