User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; zh-CN; HTC Touch S01 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.1.0.297 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTouch S01 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.1U3 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.09101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.1.0.297closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.1WebKit Android 2.3HTCTouch S01smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.1.0closeAndroid 2.3.6HTCTouch S01closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.1.0.297WebKit 534.31Android 2.3.6HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.1Webkit 534.31Android 2.3.6HTCTouch S01mobile:smartyescloseclose0.14501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:46 | by ThaDafinser