User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534+ (KHTML, like Gecko) MsnBot-Media /1.0b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-365.php
yesmsnbot-mediaBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesmsnbot-mediaBot/Crawler0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesMsnBotclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
MSN Bot WebKit 534Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:46 | by ThaDafinser