User agent detail

MOT-EX225 MIDP-2.0/CLDC-1.1 Release/31.12.2010 Browser/Opera Sync/SyncClient1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera/9.80 (MTK; U; en-US) Presto/2.5.28 Version/10.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaEX225 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.10closeMRE MotorolaMOTOKEY Social EX225mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.10Presto MTK / Nucleus MotorolaEX225smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.10close MotorolaEX225closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.10Presto 2.5.28 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.5.28MRE MotorolaMOTOKEY Social EX225mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Link Sync 10.10close MotorolaMOT-EX225Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:45 | by ThaDafinser