User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_5) AppleWebKit/600.1.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.1 Safari/537.85.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-446.php
Safari 7.1MacOSX 10.9unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 7.1WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.06301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 7.1closeOS X 10.9.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.20502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 7.1WebKit Mac 10.9desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 7.1closeOS X 10.9.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 7.1closeMac OS X 10.9.5closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 7.1closeOS X 10.9.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.20402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 7.1WebKit 600.1.17Mac OS X 10.9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 7.1Webkit 600.1.17OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 7.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 7.1closeMac OS X 10.9.0Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:45 | by ThaDafinser