User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A;FBAV/6.0.0.28.28;FBBV/1263992;FBDM/{density=1.0,width=1280,height=752};FBLC/en_US;FBCR/o2 - de;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/Lenovo B8000-H;FBSV/4.2.2;FBOP/1;FBCA/armeabi-v7a:armeabi;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoB8000-H Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.054 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Facebook close LenovoB8000-H;FBSVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 6.0 LenovoB8000-Hsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 6.0.0close LenovoB8000-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook LenovoB8000-H;FBSVmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:45 | by ThaDafinser