User agent detail

Lenovo A298t_TD/1.0 Linux/2.6.35.7 Android 2.3.5 Release/04.07.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mozilla/5.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA298t_TD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Lenovo closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5LenovoA298mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3LenovoA298tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.5closeAndroid 2.3.5LenovoA298t_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.10901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.62006 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5LenovoA298mobile:smartyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3LenovoA298tSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:44 | by ThaDafinser