User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko cXense
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
UNKNOWN Linux pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.9.2.24closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.24closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.12701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.24Gecko Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.9.2Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:43 | by ThaDafinser