User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-506.php
IE 11.0Win7 6.17.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 11.0Trident 7.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.07501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 12.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 12.0Gecko Windows 7desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 11.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 12.0Trident 7.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:43 | by ThaDafinser