User agent detail

MOT-RAZRV3x/01.2A.01 MIB/BER2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-470.php
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2unknown unknownunknown MotorolaRAZRV3xMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaRAZRV3xMobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-RAZRV3x 01.2A.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser close MotorolaRAZRV3xmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaRAZRV3xsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaRAZRV3xcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
DROID RAZRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser MotorolaRAZRV3xmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaRAZR V3xFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:42 | by ThaDafinser