User agent detail

MOT-v150/AS_G_09.09.0DR MIB/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Motorolav150 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-v150 AScloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0close MotorolaV150mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Motorolav150smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Motorolav150closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini MotorolaMotorola v150closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.0 Motorolav150mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaV150Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:42 | by ThaDafinser