User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) rekonq/1.0 Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Rekonq 1.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
rekonq WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Rekonq closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Rekonq 1.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Rekonq 1.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
rekonq 1.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Rekonq WebKit 534.34Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
rekonq 1.0Webkit 534.34Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:42 | by ThaDafinser