User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; GT-P6210 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/manufacturer-samsung.yaml
Chrome 38Android 4.0.3Blink 537.36SamsungGalaxy Tab 7.0 Plustabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.23102 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.0.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.30203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Android 4.0SamsungGT-P6210tabletyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeAndroid 4.0.3SamsungGT-P6210closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Android 4.0.3SamsungGalaxy Tab 7.0 Plustabletyescloseclose0.043 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.0SamsungGT-P6210Tabletyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:41 | by ThaDafinser