User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 4731.101.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.67 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Chrome 31.0.1650.67Chrome OS 4731.101.0Blink desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.67closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.67closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Chrome OS 4731.101desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.67closeChrome OS 31.0.1650.67closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeChrome OS 4731.101.0closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.67closeChrome OS 4731.101.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.08901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.67WebKit 537.36ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.67closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.07401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:41 | by ThaDafinser