User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.2.2; ru; Lenovo A316i) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.1.0.297 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
UC Browser 9.1Android 4.2unknown LenovoA316iMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.1U2 Android 4.2LenovoA316iMobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux LenovoA369imobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.1 Android 4.2LenovoA316ismartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.1.0closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoA316icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.1.0.297 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.1Gecko Android 4.2.2LenovoA316mobile:smartyescloseclose0.04801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:41 | by ThaDafinser