User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru; JY-F1 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/10.0.0.556 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.0Android 4.2unknown JiayuF1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.0WebKit Android 4.2JiayuF1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.2JiayuF1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.0WebKit Android 4.2JiayuJY-F1smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.0.0closeAndroid 4.2.2JiayuJY-F1closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.0.0.556WebKit 528.5Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.0Webkit 528.5Android 4.2.2JiayuF1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:41 | by ThaDafinser