User agent detail

Amoi-M6/Plat-EMP/WAP2.0/MIDP2.0/CLDC1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmoiM6 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Amoi JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Amoi-M6 Platcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close AmoiM6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
AmoiM6smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close AmoiM6closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AmoiM6mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close AmoiM630Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:40 | by ThaDafinser