User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Lenovo A328 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.92 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 43.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoA328Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA328Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.92closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357.92closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA328mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 43.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA328smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.92closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA328closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.92WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoA328mobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.92closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 4.4LenovoA328Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:40 | by ThaDafinser