User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092814 Iceweasel/3.0.3 (Debian-3.0.3-3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_misc.yaml
UNKNOWN Linux pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iceweasel 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.11001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IceWeasel 3.0.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iceweasel 3.0Gecko Debian 3.0desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Iceweasel 3.0.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceweasel 3.0.3closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iceweasel 3.0.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iceweasel 3.0.3Gecko 2008092814Linux 3.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iceweasel 3.0.3Gecko 1.9.0Debian desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:40 | by ThaDafinser