User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 6158.70.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.110 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Chrome 38.0ChromeOS unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 38.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.07601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.110closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.110closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 38.0Blink Chrome OS 6158.70desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.110closeChrome OS 38.0.2125.110closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 38.0.2125closeChrome OS 6158.70.0closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.110closeChrome OS 6158.70.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.17702 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.110WebKit 537.36ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 38Blink Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.110closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:39 | by ThaDafinser