User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Ubuntu 10.04 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Ubuntu 10.04Linux DesktopDesktop0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.12closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Ubuntu 10.04desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.12closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.12closeUbuntu 10.4closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.12closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.12Gecko 20101027Linux 10.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.12Gecko 1.9.2Ubuntu 10.04desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.12closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:38 | by ThaDafinser