User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.1; en-us ; CSL-MI410 Build/FRG83) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.2.3.162/145/352
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SpiceMi410 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.2WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.1GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2WebKit Android 2.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.3closeAndroid 2.2.1SpiceMi410closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.11601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.3.162WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.1SpiceMi-410mobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:38 | by ThaDafinser