User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061024 Firefox/2.0 (Swiftfox)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Swiftfox 2.0GNU/Linux Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Swiftfox 2.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Swiftfox 2.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Swiftfox 2.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0Gecko 20061024Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:38 | by ThaDafinser