User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux mips; U;HbbTV/1.1.1 (+RTSP;DMM;Dreambox;0.1a;1.0;) CE-HTML/1.0; xx) AppleWebKit/535.19 no/Volksbox QtWebkit/2.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Webkit 535.19DMMDreamboxtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 535.19closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.26103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux DMMDreamboxtv0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux DMMDreamboxcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 535.19Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46505 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 535.19 DMMDreamboxtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:37 | by ThaDafinser