User agent detail

SonyEricssonW150a/1.0 TelecaBrowser/Q07C1-3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
Obigo Sony EricssonYendofeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonW150a 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 7close Sony EricssonW150amobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Sony EricssonYendofeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close SonyEricssonW150acloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.17302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W150acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7C Sony EricssonW150amobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SonyEricssonW150aFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:37 | by ThaDafinser