User agent detail

Xiaomi_2014501_TD-LTE/V1 Linux/3.10.0 Android/4.4 Release/04.07.2014 Browser/AppleWebKit537.36 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 System/Android 4.4 XiaoMi/MiuiBrowser/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
MIUI Browser 1.0Android 4.4WebKit XiaomiHongmi 4Gsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse closeAndroid desktop-browsercloseclose0.28703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MIUI Browser 1.0WebKit Android 4.4XiaomiHongmi 4Gsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.0closeAndroid 4.4closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.0.0WebKit Android 4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MIUI Browser 1.0Webkit 537.36Android 4.4XiaomiRedmi Red Ricemobile:smartyescloseclose0.15201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:37 | by ThaDafinser