User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2; de-de) AppleWebKit/534.35 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.35 Puffin/2.9737AT Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GenericTablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 2.0WebKit Android 2.2Tabletyesyes0.07801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 2.9737closeAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 2.9737WebKit Android 2.2yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 2.9737closeAndroid 2.2Tabletcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 2.9737WebKit 534.35 Android Tabletcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 2Webkit 534.35Android 2.2tabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.053 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:36 | by ThaDafinser