User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (BREW 3.1.5; U; en-us; Sanyo; NetFront/3.5.1/AMB) Boost SCP3810
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GenericSmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5.1close SanyoSCP6760mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront Brew 3.1SanyoW2feature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5.1closeBREW 3.1.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5.1 Brew 3.1.5SanyoSCP3810mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SanyoSCP6760Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:36 | by ThaDafinser