User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.12; Mac_PowerPC)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-ie.yaml
Internet Explorer 5.1.2OS X Tasman desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.1Tasman MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.12closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.12Trident Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.12close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.12closeMac OS closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.12closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.12Trident Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.1.2Tasman OS X desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.12closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:35 | by ThaDafinser